Purpose

This single-center, 400-patient, randomized controlled trial assesses the impact of a patient- and provider-facing EPIC Best Practice Advisory (BPA; alert-based computerized decision support tool) to increase guideline-directed utilization of statin and statin-alternative oral LDL-C lowering therapies in patients with PAD who are not being prescribed LDL-C-lowering therapy.

Conditions

Eligibility

Eligible Ages
Over 18 Years
Eligible Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • All patients ≥ 18 years old - Seen in Cardiovascular Medicine Clinic, Primary Care, Podiatry, Vascular Surgery, and Diabetology - Medical history entry, visit diagnosis, or problem list entry of PAD - Not prescribed LDL-C-lowering therapy

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients taking a statin, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, a PCSK9 inhibitor, inclisiran or a combination will be excluded

Study Design

Phase
N/A
Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description
400-patient U.S.-based single-center Quality Improvement Initiative in the form of a randomized controlled trial focused on the feasibility of implementation of this patient- and provider-facing alert-based CDS (EPIC BPA)
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description
Participants, investigators and outcomes assessors will be blinded to the assignment of the clinician to the computer alert or control (non-alert) group.

Arm Groups

ArmDescriptionAssigned Intervention
Experimental
Alert
Alert-based CDS will consist of an on-screen electronic alert that will notify the clinician that the patient has an indication for LDL-C-lowering therapy but is not prescribed any. The clinician will have the opportunity to proceed to an order template through which appropriate lipid-lowering can be prescribed. The clinician could also elect to learn more about current evidence-based recommendations for LDL-C lowering in the PAD population. Finally, the clinician could elect to proceed without ordering oral LDL-C-lowering therapy or reading evidence-based recommendations for LDL-C lowering but would have to provide a rationale for not doing so.
  • Behavioral: Computer Alert
    On-screen alert-based decision support raising awareness of need for lipid-lowering therapy in patients with peripheral artery disease
    Other names:
    • EPIC Best Practice Advisory
No Intervention
No Alert
No on-screen notification will be issued to the clinician

Recruiting Locations

Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston 4930956, Massachusetts 6254926 02115
Contact:
Gregory Piazza, MD, MS
617-732-6984
gpiazza@bwh.harvard.edu

More Details

Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Study Contact

Gregory Piazza
6177326984
gpiazza@bwh.harvard.edu

Detailed Description

A Joint Task Force from the European Atherosclerosis Society and the European Society of Vascular Medicine recommends a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal reduction of greater than 50% from baseline and a target of 55 mg/dL in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). An analysis of 1982 provider visits of patients with PAD in national outpatient databases in the U.S. between 2005-2012 showed that a statin was prescribed in only 33.1% of patients (Berger JS, Ladapo JA. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:2293-2300). Data from Europe demonstrates marginally better adherence to guidelines with 40% of patients with PAD prescribed a statin (Subherwal S, et al. Circulation. 2012;126:1345). Explanations for underutilization of LDL-C-lowering therapy in patients with PAD include clinician knowledge gaps regarding evidence-based clinical practice guideline recommendations, provider inertia, the need for prior authorization for some agents, statin intolerance, and statin hesitancy. Statin intolerance is defined as the inability to tolerate a dose of statin required to sufficiently reduce cardiovascular risk and has been estimated to affect up to 15% of patients treated with statins (Banach M, et al. Arch Med Sci 2015;11:1-23 and Banach M, et al. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2015;14:935-55). While numerous statin options exist and non-statin oral options for LDL-C lowering, such as ezetimibe and bempedoic acid, are widely available, lack of awareness and inconsistent implementation contribute to underutilization in patients at high-risk for cardiovascular events, such as those with PAD. Bempedoic acid, with or without ezetimibe, is a newer option for LDL-C lowering that offers a lower prevalence of musculoskeletal side effects than statins (Diabetes Ther. 2021 Jul;12(7):1779-1789). However, familiarity with this option remains limited outside of Preventive Cardiology and Lipid Clinics. The failure to achieve guideline-directed LDL-C targets due to clinician knowledge gaps, provider inertia, the need for prior authorization, statin intolerance, and statin hesitancy in the PAD population demonstrates similar clinical obstacles to other areas of cardiovascular medicine in which quality of care was impacted by provider and patient knowledge gaps. An alert-based computerized decision support (CDS) approach has been shown to be effective in such circumstances and could be similarly effective for optimizing lipid management in patients with PAD. This single-center, 400-patient, randomized controlled trial assesses the impact of a patient- and provider-facing EPIC Best Practice Advisory (BPA; alert-based computerized decision support tool) to increase guideline-directed utilization of statin and statin-alternative oral LDL-C lowering therapies in patients with PAD who are not being prescribed LDL-C-lowering therapy.

Notice

Study information shown on this site is derived from ClinicalTrials.gov (a public registry operated by the National Institutes of Health). The listing of studies provided is not certain to be all studies for which you might be eligible. Furthermore, study eligibility requirements can be difficult to understand and may change over time, so it is wise to speak with your medical care provider and individual research study teams when making decisions related to participation.